聖經學者 Hurtado 回應木乃伊面具裡的聖經抄本

原刊於此網站

Here are my own thoughts on the matter.

1) First, no such claim can be engaged at all unless/until the item in question is made available for critical scrutiny by qualified scholars (and that means scholars who are qualified to make an independent judgement on palaeographical grounds). This hasn’t been done, and so the entire matter is (or should be) moot. What do I think of the claim? Can’t comment, as there is no item openly available for critical scrutiny.

留下回應

贊助連結
陳韋安洪麗芳 寫給你心中尚未崩壞的地方

 

 

精選文章